Wall Street shifts to defensive stocks as tech giants crumble
The US stock market experienced a tumultuous session on Thursday, November 13, characterized by a dramatic sector rotation that negatively impacted technology and artificial intelligence stocks, while defensive and industrial sectors enjoyed an unexpected revival. The S&P 500 index fell 1.66% to 6,737.49 points, while the Dow Jones dropped 1.65% to 47,457.22 points. This correction occurs amid ongoing concerns about the sustainability of valuations for tech giants and growing uncertainty over a potential interest rate cut in December.
Defensive and Cyclical Stocks Regain Appeal
The most striking sector rotation focused on the materials and chemicals stocks, which posted the strongest gains of the session. LyondellBasell Industries, a giant in specialty chemicals, surged 5.10% to $45.52, signaling a shift by investors towards stocks perceived to offer better intrinsic value. Albemarle Corporation, a lithium producer for batteries, rose 3.85% to $114.57, while Eastman Chemical Company gained 2.92% to $62.72. This rebound in chemical stocks reflects a market reassessment of traditional and cyclical sectors, which have often been sidelined by investors' enthusiasm for megacap tech stocks. In the energy sector, winners were abundant. APA Corporation advanced 3.35%, while Chevron rose 1.47%, benefiting from the easing of inflation fears and somewhat normalized macroeconomic expectations. Defensive sectors like food also attracted buyers, with General Mills up 1.78% and Archer Daniels Midland gaining 1.87%. Cisco Systems registered a remarkable gain of 4.62% to $77.38 after posting strong earnings that exceeded expectations, showing that not all tech stocks are equal in the face of valuation turmoil. Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffett's fund known for favoring undervalued stocks, rose 2.13% to $513.11, a performance that highlights the increased investor appetite for selectivity and quality over growth at any cost.
The Tech and AI Sector in Turmoil
The downfall of technology stocks has been remarkably significant, with dramatic declines affecting the presumed champions of the artificial intelligence revolution. Disney, whose troubles extend beyond technology to broader strategic issues, fell 7.75% to $107.61 after posting disappointing quarterly revenue results despite profit exceeding expectations. This debacle illustrates the abrupt shift in investor sentiment towards companies whose promised explosive growth is not materializing as anticipated. Tesla experienced a sharp correction of 6.64% to $401.99, its worst day since July, in response to several pieces of bad news, including the recall of 10,500 residential energy units due to risks of overheating and fire, and a drop in sales in China, the world's largest electric vehicle market. The core of the semiconductor and AI sector was particularly hard hit. Supermicro, which had benefited from the frenzy around data center investments, plunged 7.44% to $35.09. Seagate Technology lost 7.31%, Palantir Technologies 6.53%, while Moderna, often associated with new biological technologies, declined 6.55%. Chip manufacturers all suffered: Intel fell 5.23%, AMD 4.22%, and even Broadcom, once considered an essential beneficiary of the AI wave, retreated 4.29%. Lam Research lost 5.02%, reflecting concerns over the supply-demand balance in semiconductor manufacturing equipment. These massive declines reflect a growing investor awareness of the crucial issue of the actual profitability of these astronomical investments in AI infrastructure and research.
Macroeconomic Uncertainty and Monetary Policy Challenges
The role of macroeconomic considerations in this rotation should not be underestimated. Recent comments from Federal Reserve officials have cast doubt on the likelihood of a rate cut in December, a major concern for a market that had largely priced in this expectation. Susan Collins, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, stated that it would likely be appropriate to keep rates unchanged for some time, reversing her previous stance. This shift immediately dampened hopes for monetary easing, with federal funds futures now showing only a 51.9% probability of a cut in December, down from nearly 70% a week earlier. These political economy considerations reinforce the thesis that the market has for too long uncritically accepted exorbitant valuations for growth promises that remain highly speculative. The end of the US government shutdown also hints at a flood of economic data that could confirm or challenge current assumptions about the trajectory of inflation and employment, adding further sources of volatility in the weeks ahead.
This content has been automatically translated using artificial intelligence. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances may differ from the original French version.