Paternity leave: a new demographic tool for French fathers

A Now Clarified Legislative Framework

The legislative journey for the birth leave policy was quite eventful before settling into its final form. Initially scheduled for implementation in July 2027, the start date was moved up to January 1, 2026, following an amendment championed by Representative Sarah Legrain. This acceleration of the initiative addresses the « demographic urgency » mentioned by Emmanuel Macron as early as January 2024. The bill passed the National Assembly on its first reading on November 12, 2025, with several significant adjustments, including the option to split the leave into two separate periods.

On November 24, 2025, the Senate introduced major changes: one particular modification removed the requirement that at least one month of leave not be taken simultaneously by both parents, reversing an aim for a better distribution of responsibilities. Senators also voted against allowing the leave to be divided, creating tension with the position previously adopted by the representatives.

These differences highlight the underlying societal issues where the question of parental equality clashes with the practical demands of businesses and families. The initiative adds to the existing maternity and paternity leaves, which last sixteen weeks and twenty-eight days respectively, and does not replace the traditional parental leave, which is still available until the child turns three years old.

A Financial Framework and Measures Aimed at Attractiveness

Compensation serves as the economic cornerstone of the plan. The government has set the compensation rate at 70% of net salary for the first month and 60% for the second month, as outlined in the announced terms. These percentages represent a substantial income loss that households will have to absorb. According to estimates from the Family Allowance Fund, compensation would range from 170 to 450 euros depending on individual circumstances. This broad range reflects the salary disparities within the workforce.

Each parent can choose to take one or two months of leave, a personal choice that cannot be transferred to the other parent. The leave must be used within nine months following the birth or adoption. Parents can decide to take the leave simultaneously or alternately, providing some organizational flexibility. A notice period of fifteen days to one month is required to be given to the employer before the desired start date. No employment seniority conditions are required, making this leave accessible to young workers or those who have recently changed jobs. This universality is a key element in the fairness of the plan. To fund this measure, the government had considered extending the age for increased family allowances for the second child from fourteen to eighteen years. However, senators rejected this amendment on November 24, 2025, raising questions about long-term funding.

An Equal Opening Masking Practical Tensions

Parental leave is available to all parents without discrimination. Biological mothers and fathers, spouses, partners, or civil union partners (PACS) living with the mother, as well as adoptive parents, are all eligible. The reform explicitly outlines equal conditions for same-sex families. In a female couple, the non-birth mother can take the leave if a pre-birth recognition has been made. In a male adoptive couple, both parents can benefit. This inclusivity represents significant progress for blended and same-sex families.

However, tensions remain among political actors regarding the specific modalities. Aurore Bergé, the Minister Delegate for Gender Equality, emphasized the goal of providing more flexibility to parents, particularly in cases where the mother experiences a difficult postpartum period. Socialist Senator Laurence Rossignol stressed the importance of ensuring that the parental bond is not solely between the mother and child during the first two months of life, a condition she deems necessary for a fairer distribution of mental load. She also called for measures to ensure that income loss is minimized, so the measure remains attractive to fathers, who, on average, earn more and might hesitate to forgo their income.

Senators also expressed concerns about practical challenges for businesses, including the adaptation of payroll systems for social security reporting by January 1, 2026, justifying their vote to postpone it to January 1, 2027. This scheduling discrepancy between the National Assembly and the Senate remains an unresolved issue to date.

Related articles: